| SPCC Secondary Containment Requirements for Parked Trucks |
| Monday, 01/18/2010 |
|
A new SPCC exemption from sized secondary containment requirements for cargo tank vehicles and transports containing product and parked overnight is available beginning January 14, 2010. The exemption eliminates costly sized secondary containment requirements such as dikes, berms, diversionary structures, catchment basins and oil water separators for applicable truck parking areas. Instead, these parking areas must comply with SPCC general secondary containment which may be met using other methods of containment such as absorbents or drip pans to contain releases from parked cargo tank vehicles and trucks. IMPORTANT! Many Association Executives and marketers are receiving advertising fliers from vendors claiming that drip pans are “required” for compliance. This is not true. While drip pans are one method of compliance with general secondary containment requirements, there are other compliance alternatives that may be less costly such as using absorbents. The SPCC regulations do not require one method of general secondary containment over another. Whether absorbents or drip pans or some other containment method is used for compliance is a decision for individual marketers to make after consulting with their SPCC professional engineer. NEW SPCC AMENDMENT FOR PARKED TRUCKS CONTAINING PRODUCT EFFECTIVE JANUARY 14, 2010 The U.S. EPA’s amendment to federal SPCC regulations that eliminates sized secondary containment requirements for cargo tank vehicles containing product and parked over night takes effect on January 14, 2010. The amendment provides significant regulatory relief for petroleum marketers who will no longer be required to park cargo tank vehicles containing product within a secondary containment structure (i.e. dykes, berms, diversionary structures, catchment basins and oil water separators etc.). The EPA SPCC regulations do not specifically require cargo tank vehicles and transports be parked within sized secondary containment structures. However, an agency regulatory interpretation determined that parked cargo tanks containing product were no different from “temporary” storage tanks, and, therefore subject to onerous and expensive sized secondary containment requirements. SPCC sized secondary containment requires secondary containment sufficient to hold a catastrophic release from the single largest compartment of a cargo tank vehicle or transport. Over the past several years, the EPA began to enforce this little known interpretation more aggressively. To avoid thousands of dollars in new compliance costs, PMAA and NEFI convinced the EPA to change the sized secondary containment requirements for parked trucks such that berms, dykes, diversionary structures, catchment basins and oil water separators would not be necessary for cargo tank vehicles and transports. Instead, the amendment requires these vehicles to comply with general secondary containment requirements. General secondary containment may be met using absorbents and/or drip pans to contain a release of a few gallons from a leaky valve or hose rather than a catastrophic release from the single largest compartment of the cargo tank. Yesterday was the effective date for the SPCC parked truck amendment. Petroleum marketers should confer with their professional engineer to update and incorporate the new general secondary containment requirements into existing SPCC plans. Many engineers may not be aware of the amendment and may have to be “educated” on the exemption. The following regulatory points should be all your engineer needs to know to successfully incorporate the parked truck amendment into your SPCC plan:
More information can be downloaded at http://www.epa.gov/OEM/content/spcc/index.htmor contact PMAA Regulatory Counsel Mark S. Morgan at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it or (202) 364-6767. |

